(This post was last modified: 12-13-2022, 11:15 PM by Moriarty.)
It’s about time that I posted my thoughts about the Lambda Ares v2. I was fortunate enough to get one from the recent batch, and I was already a big fan of the Athena (which gets better and better as I have learned to optimize the angle).
In a nutshell, I find the Ares to be highly efficient, and even more efficient than the Athena. It still feels mild-medium aggression in use, and it is very gentle to my skin. So I’d term it a mild razor with top level efficiency. I get very easy, quick and consistent BBS shaves and the shaves last as long for me as any razor has ever achieved. Like the Athena, there is no blade feel at all with the Ares v2, but it gives a ton of feedback. The most significant differences between the Athena and Ares, for me, are the feel of the different combs (Athena hybrid comb adds a bit more smoothness) and, while the Athena is very efficient the Ares is a bit more efficient. I also find the handle on the Ares a little more slippery if it gets soap on it, but it’s not slippery for me if it is just wet.
Do I like the Ares v2 or the Athena more? At the moment the Athena shades it very slightly for me - it is plenty efficient and the solid / hybrid bar makes it feel a little smoother (though both seem equally gentle to my skin - it is only a difference in feel). And the Athena shoots water from the sides, which is still not growing old for me. But I’m starting to feel that these are my top two razors.
These are really interesting razors, and very differently engineered to anything else. I want to work out what is happening, and how a razor like the Ares, with zero blade exposure and only 0.3mm blade gap, can be approximately as efficient as my Rocnel Sailor or Wolfman WR2 1.55, and how it can yield shaves that sometimes last even longer than those razors.
I’ve asked Theo what he thinks causes the efficiency (and he admits he was surprised that the Ares v2 is just as efficient as the v1, despite changing it from positive to zero blade exposure). He attributes it to the comb / safety bar together with the high blade curvature and shallow angle that the blade is presented to the skin. My experience suggests that the extremely close clamping of the blade (just 0.55mm from the blade edge) has a significant effect too, especially against the grain. I think these factors in combination result in a blade edge that is shallow to the skin, slicing (not scraping) at the base of the hair without any deflection or waviness, and the cutting gap is effectively extended by the gaps in the open comb, or the slots in the Athena safety bar. I suspect that the very long-lasting shaves I can get from the Ares are also due to the blade angle and rigidity - efficiency is not necessarily the same as longevity, and if the razor cuts hair more evenly and flat to the skin then, intuitively, it should feel smooth for longer than a razor that is cutting at an angle or cutting hairs unevenly (even when they both are BBS after the shave).
The outcome appears to be that the razor head derives its efficiency from blade angle, rigidity, and safety bar design - not from blade exposure or blade gap. And, since a high blade exposure and blade gap tends to increase aggression and skin irritation, this approach to razor design seems superior to me. You get all the efficiency without any of the harshness that other highly efficient razors have. You can have your cake AND eat it. This is a marvellous razor.
In a nutshell, I find the Ares to be highly efficient, and even more efficient than the Athena. It still feels mild-medium aggression in use, and it is very gentle to my skin. So I’d term it a mild razor with top level efficiency. I get very easy, quick and consistent BBS shaves and the shaves last as long for me as any razor has ever achieved. Like the Athena, there is no blade feel at all with the Ares v2, but it gives a ton of feedback. The most significant differences between the Athena and Ares, for me, are the feel of the different combs (Athena hybrid comb adds a bit more smoothness) and, while the Athena is very efficient the Ares is a bit more efficient. I also find the handle on the Ares a little more slippery if it gets soap on it, but it’s not slippery for me if it is just wet.
Do I like the Ares v2 or the Athena more? At the moment the Athena shades it very slightly for me - it is plenty efficient and the solid / hybrid bar makes it feel a little smoother (though both seem equally gentle to my skin - it is only a difference in feel). And the Athena shoots water from the sides, which is still not growing old for me. But I’m starting to feel that these are my top two razors.
These are really interesting razors, and very differently engineered to anything else. I want to work out what is happening, and how a razor like the Ares, with zero blade exposure and only 0.3mm blade gap, can be approximately as efficient as my Rocnel Sailor or Wolfman WR2 1.55, and how it can yield shaves that sometimes last even longer than those razors.
I’ve asked Theo what he thinks causes the efficiency (and he admits he was surprised that the Ares v2 is just as efficient as the v1, despite changing it from positive to zero blade exposure). He attributes it to the comb / safety bar together with the high blade curvature and shallow angle that the blade is presented to the skin. My experience suggests that the extremely close clamping of the blade (just 0.55mm from the blade edge) has a significant effect too, especially against the grain. I think these factors in combination result in a blade edge that is shallow to the skin, slicing (not scraping) at the base of the hair without any deflection or waviness, and the cutting gap is effectively extended by the gaps in the open comb, or the slots in the Athena safety bar. I suspect that the very long-lasting shaves I can get from the Ares are also due to the blade angle and rigidity - efficiency is not necessarily the same as longevity, and if the razor cuts hair more evenly and flat to the skin then, intuitively, it should feel smooth for longer than a razor that is cutting at an angle or cutting hairs unevenly (even when they both are BBS after the shave).
The outcome appears to be that the razor head derives its efficiency from blade angle, rigidity, and safety bar design - not from blade exposure or blade gap. And, since a high blade exposure and blade gap tends to increase aggression and skin irritation, this approach to razor design seems superior to me. You get all the efficiency without any of the harshness that other highly efficient razors have. You can have your cake AND eat it. This is a marvellous razor.