#101
(This post was last modified: 11-04-2018, 12:58 PM by Shavemd.)
(11-04-2018, 12:09 PM)DanLaw Wrote:
Quote:I hope to get a WR2 as I have a few WR1’s, however, I feel it is inappropriate to slam other razor makers. I also have Paradigm razors and enjoy the shave I get from them. If there is a reason you don’t like a razor it would make sense to say why but to degrade another type of razor to hype another without explaining why you feel that way helps no one who may be interested in that razor.


YMMV but since called out regarding deltas,  elaborating unwillingly (don’t enjoy being critical re artisan products given effort and personal finances they invest).

Had a number of Paradigm DEs (17-4, Ti and TiII)

The build quality is good, on a level with Timeless but nowhere near duFour products.  Have found the ability to control the razor is compromised by handle shapes emphasizing style over ease of secure grip. Blade feel is virtually nonexistent compared to any duFour razor in any gap used to date including BBS1 (not sure why others claim no blade feel as I find it as apparent as a straight edge giving incredible angular feedback) and WR1s ranging in gap from 0,48 thru 0,74 both open comb and straight bar.  Constantly get bites and weepers using even mild blades with any Paradigm DE used to date (have tried a broad array of blades ranging from Gillette GSB to Feather e.g., Polsilver blades deliver an irritated and swollen face taking a day to heal between shaves).  Finally prefer a razor with more heft.

Getting a WR2 to compare in the coming weeks and will definitely opine in this thread as to how it compares to other duFour razors which are my benchmark for DE excellence.

The comment was not directed at you but the information on why you do not care for Paradigm razors you have tried is very helpful. YMMV is very true, as I just had a wonderful shave with the 17-4 Paradigm yesterday, very similar to what I get from my WR1 86. I made the comment because as I read thru these threads I see disparaging comments on many different razor manufactures, including Wolfman, but many times no explanation of Why. I find it beneficial to hear why people do or don't like a razor, as I make a decision as to whether to purchase it or not.  This is just my reason for why I read many of these threads.
#102
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2018, 07:47 PM by Dragonsbeard.)
The comment was not directed at you but the information on why you do not care for Paradigm razors you have tried is very helpful. YMMV is very true, as I just had a wonderful shave with the 17-4 Paradigm yesterday, very similar to what I get from my WR1 86. I made the comment because as I read thru these threads I see disparaging comments on many different razor manufactures, including Wolfman, but many times no explanation of Why. I find it beneficial to hear why people do or don't like a razor, as I make a decision as to whether to purchase it or not.  This is just my reason for why I read many of these threads.
[/quote]

I agree with you Mark on this! Also I can't imagine anyone not being able to get a great shave from at least one of the Paradigm razors as they are all excellent shavers. Must be a technique issue. Love the 17 4 and the Paradigm Ti 1 was spectacular and in my Shave Off it was a tad bit more efficient than the WR1 .86OC and a bit less efficient than the WR1 .94 DC can't wait till my WR2 gets here for a test spin although I know it's going to be mildly efficient from what you said.

Deus Vult, Anick, LOOT and 1 others like this post
#103

Golf Nut
San Antonio, Texas
for all that have used both (WR2 and WR1), what would be the equivalent gap in the WR2, which is the closest to the WR1 Standard gap in terms of smoothness and efficiency.

Weekly, LOOT, Marcos and 1 others like this post
#104
I’d say around 0.61 or slightly less

LOOT and herbert7890 like this post
#105
The 1.15 WR2 OC is similar to a 0.86 WR1 or slightly more

herbert7890, Kehole, LOOT and 2 others like this post
#106
With a feather I’d say closer to a .67 in efficiency with the smoothness of a .54

LOOT, carbold, jfim88 and 1 others like this post
#107

Golf Nut
San Antonio, Texas
(This post was last modified: 11-10-2018, 01:09 PM by herbert7890.)
(11-10-2018, 07:25 AM)carbold Wrote: I’d say around 0.61 or slightly less

Thanks!

(11-10-2018, 07:55 AM)Kehole Wrote: With a feather I’d say closer to a .67 in efficiency with the smoothness of a .54

Many thanks as well!!

LOOT likes this post
#108
Final mail call....EVER

Wolfman WR2 1.05 gap

Large stand

I didn’t buy a handle this go around. Can’t wait for tomorrow! I’ll share thoughts tomorrow comparing to the first release .97 gap

[Image: f7cb990b304cf7cd381917606f69983d.jpg]

herbert7890, Razdon, Deus Vult and 11 others like this post
#109
The wra2 stand is awesome

LOOT, Kehole, herbert7890 and 2 others like this post
#110
(11-16-2018, 11:44 PM)Nh wet shaver Wrote: The wra2 stand is awesome


I love it. I just grabbed it to hold my wr1 and Darwin combo but it looks great with anything in it.

LOOT, herbert7890, TheHunter and 1 others like this post


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)