(This post was last modified: 12-29-2020, 01:34 PM by DSR.)
(12-29-2020, 05:31 AM)shaveSymptomatic Wrote:(12-29-2020, 05:29 AM)celestino Wrote:(12-29-2020, 04:41 AM)shaveSymptomatic Wrote: OK, 3rd shave with the 0.95 SB Ti SLIM. My final thoughts are that this base plate is slightly less efficient than the original 0.95 SB but just as smooth. Blade feel is minimal to me. I think this is a great option for those who don't like the bulky original plates, and don't mind sacrificing a tad of efficacy in order to have a slimmer head.
I'm tempted to keep mine but it's too similar to the original to justify doing so, and I really don't mind a bulky head.
Aren't the Slim heads stated to have a 0.5mm gap? I don't believe they have the same gap as the .95
That's correct. The SLIM does however have greater exposure.
Initially I also thought that the SLIM plate had greater exposure. But, according to their website, both the SLIM and the classic .95 plate have the same blade exposure, ie 0.05 mm or 0.002”.
I emailed Timeless and they confirmed that info was correct, so I guess the fact the SLIM has more blade feel and is allegedly more aggressive (though not for everyone, as it turns out from comments above...) is due to the overall geometry and the angle at which the blade is clamped, ie the angle is less with this versus the original plate.