Timeless Slim Head Razors

Looks to me like the top cap on the right is lower profile, yet sounds like Timeless is saying the top cap remains the same?

I like both the old and slim base plates, but it is a shame they can't somehow keep the nice rounded curve of the old bar on the new base plate. It's like how more curl adds more character to a good handlebar mustache.

Yeah, caps look slightly different. I think they said parts were interchangeable which doesn't necessarily mean the same.

Maybe its just the picture, but the top cap on the slim baseplate looks thinner to me also... I would like to see more close up pics of the top caps side by side to get a better idea. I hope Matt changes his mind down the road and makes a DC Thin plate also as I have become spoiled with my Ti95DC being my only razor that I own... OC 1st pass / SB 2nd pass BBS every other day!!

Matt has explicitly confirmed that only the base plate is different.

Yeah, caps look slightly different. I think they said parts were interchangeable which doesn't necessarily mean the same.

Maybe its just the picture, but the top cap on the slim baseplate looks thinner to me also... I would like to see more close up pics of the top caps side by side to get a better idea. I hope Matt changes his mind down the road and makes a DC Thin plate also as I have become spoiled with my Ti95DC being my only razor that I own... OC 1st pass / SB 2nd pass BBS every other day!!

Matt has explicitly confirmed that only the base plate is different.

Thanks for the info

Hard to tell just how much "weight" or height they took off the original with the pictures.

What was the exposure of the original? 
Okay looked it up. Original .95 is the same as the slim, 0.05 exposure. The .68 is neutral.

Okay, I confess ... I'm challenged when it comes to higher mathematics 

So 0.05 is the equivalent of .95 ?

Why doesn't Timeless just say .95 instead of confusing dullards like me ?

Hard to tell just how much "weight" or height they took off the original with the pictures.

What was the exposure of the original? 
Okay looked it up. Original .95 is the same as the slim, 0.05 exposure. The .68 is neutral.

Okay, I confess ... I'm challenged when it comes to higher mathematics 

So 0.05 is the equivalent of .95 ?

Why doesn't Timeless just say .95 instead of confusing dullards like me ?

Probably so people don't confuse it with the .95 as they say this one has more blade reveal if I understood correctly........But thanks for the math !

Hi Jimmy

I think in my view it's a pretty good and balance I like both Stainless and Titanium, I reached out to Medina Brothers and spoke to Matt they are all sold out of them and from what I seen it's fantastic yet shaves nice and looks really nice that slim look and top cap it's exceptional.

I'm getting on my way stainless steel timeless with scalloped head and plate .68 and slim version as well, I will be getting scratch and dent and part's are Raw no Teflon etc..I requested and they been kind enough to send I to me as it a lot easier to polish depending in parts what to water sand etc..

I will post it here as usual...

Give a try Jimmy to new slim baseplate it's worth it..I seen Chris IMCDB on YouTube did shave last night and was pretty awesome shave.

Take Care 

Alan

From Timeless

Blade Exposure: .095 mm blade gap is 0.002" and 0.68 mm is zero.

BLADE EXPOSURE: 0.05 mm (Slim edition)

Jimmy, it looks like this

0.5mm gap, 0.05mm exposure
0.68mm gap, neutral exposure
0.95mm gap, 0.05mm exposure

Would help if they didn't mix units

I wish there was a plate SLIM Scalloped!

First time I like head geometry of Timeless.
This new Slim Edition is nice.



The OC version sounds smooth too.
https://youtu.be/9qNZOlj93Zg

Just came in today. Looks great & will be in the batters box for tomorrow morning’s shave....





Slim in the Middle, Ti left, Stainless right....