(07-10-2024, 02:45 AM)Tedolph Wrote: I am going to defend Tester here to a degree. Here is part of what he said:
"But technique requires the equipment to meet an acceptable standard...before technique can start to do its magic."
I think the important part is that the equipment must meet "an acceptable standard". To that extent I think he is right. As I said up thread, I can not get a decent shave with Cremo and a cheap Dorco twin blade disposable razor no matter how hard I try, and I have tried multiple times. The blades are too dull and the so called "shave cream" has no cushion whatsoever.
But here, in our example, the new wet shaver is starting off with competent equipment from our related thread, so even by Tester's standard our hypothetical new wet shaver should be able to get a good shave with the right advice.
Also, I want to complement everyone for disagreeing thoughtfully and without being disagreeable.
I guess the only mea culpa I can offer is that in my earlier post, I was responding exclusively to the words in the Thread Topic and not specifically the contents of the first post.
Having read the first post more carefully, I see you mentioned "an entry level DE razor"
Having shaved with some versions of the above, I would still say my original comments apply.
I never had much luck with some entry level razors like Edwin Jagger, Muhle R89.
On the other hand I have had spectacular outings with other entry level razors like a UK redtip and a vintage NEW.
We can argue that the examples Im giving are not exactly entry level razors...however based on my current razor line-up,
I feel they are.
I believe the technique I used on all the entry level razors I cited was pretty much the same...what made the difference, I feel, was that the equipment
in the latter example I provided was of a higher standard for my facial geometry.