There are some very good people posting on this thread, on both sides (of the debate).
But I do not see any intent of a conspiracy, or co-ordination to derail or debunk this thread.
I see a bunch of prospective buyers asking some tough questions, as they should, before
plonking down $600 approx for a razor, because no one wants an albatross around their neck.
If you make a mistake with a Wolfman, there is an easy remedy...but not always.
From what I've seen on forums, there are 3 kinds of buyers for shaving hardware. Those for whom
every new product is an instant buy every time, those who will wait for the early adopters to post their
experiences, and if they trust them, they'll jump in too. And the ones who spend hours doing an unhealthy
amount of research and comparison before gingerly dipping their toe in.
For me, I approach a product like this in stages. Initially, Im not that much into minutiae....I look at whether
the product grabs me visually, the weight or bulk of it and the price relative to those things. If it ticks those boxes,
then I explore deeper. From my perspective, based on what was revealed, this product fell at the first three hurdles.
So I'm struggling to see what is wrong with expressing that thought. Is the current thinking among members that if you
don't like or agree with something, you need keep your mouth shut and leave the discussion?
If there is something wrong with a member's post, there is a report button and some really good mods to take care of it.
Personally, I feel that massaging a discussion into a zone where everyone is holding hands and singing kumbaya does
not promote a spirited exchange of ideas. And the larger community, who often read without posting, are usually the poorer
for it.
Civil discussion without snide, passive -aggressive behaviour is the standard to strive for on forums,
and I support it fully. To borrow from a phrase used in football, we play the ball, not the man.