(03-19-2020, 11:56 AM)AQU Wrote: What’s the difference between the short comb and the Tek? Anyone know?
I’m not 100% sure but he did do the Short comb based on the Gillette New Short Comb and although a nicely efficient razor it is not in the same league as the I Tech . That’s the only guess I can offer. Maybe an email to the site unless we have a member who has both.
CCity I prefer efficient or aggressive razors and have used many of those you listed (some with shims) without any issues. I have no issues with wide-open adjustables (take a look at a Futur on 6.5) or a shimmed Timeless 95, CGL3 or WR2 145. However the Ikon Tech is one that I have never been satisfied in my ability to get a smooth enough shave to make it worth my effort. Even "riding the cap" and using "smoother" blades has not been fun with considerable sensation of skipping or perhaps dragging - it is a humbling tool but one heck of a challenge. If anyone gets this new release is it the same as the "original" or what do you do to "tame" the iTech ?
(03-19-2020, 03:32 PM)AJSharp Wrote: CCity I prefer efficient or aggressive razors and have used many of those you listed (some with shims) without any issues. I have no issues with wide-open adjustables (take a look at a Futur on 6.5) or a shimmed Timeless 95, CGL3 or WR2 145. However the Ikon Tech is one that I have never been satisfied in my ability to get a smooth enough shave to make it worth my effort. Even "riding the cap" and using "smoother" blades has not been fun with considerable sensation of skipping or perhaps dragging - it is a humbling tool but one heck of a challenge. If anyone gets this new release is it the same as the "original" or what do you do to "tame" the iTech ?
I agree AJSharp . To me, the Ikon Shavecraft Tech is in a league of its own. I use my Rex Ambassador frequently, and have never used it except wide open at 6.5. In fact, I've never used any of my adjustables at any setting except wide open (Slim, Variant, Mergress). I find the Timeless .95 OC milder than the others (though I don't do any shimming), and the CG L3 OC first generation brass is my favorite razor.
--Scott
(03-19-2020, 11:56 AM)AQU Wrote: What’s the difference between the short comb and the Tek? Anyone know?When I had the iKon ShaveCraft 103 Short Comb, I found it to be slightly less aggressive than the Tek. The open combs on that one can feel sharp, though, making it feel more aggressive than it is. The key is to use a shallow angle, which can alleviate the prickly feel of the combs. It’s quite a nice shaver when the angle is right.
Whenever I go to shave, I assume there’s someone else on the planet shaving, so I say “I’m gonna go shave, too.”
– Mitch Hedberg
– Mitch Hedberg
He is continuously dropping the price.
Now: $55. for all razor.
Head is only: $35
https://ikonrazors.com/product/ikon-tek-tech-head/
Now: $55. for all razor.
Head is only: $35
https://ikonrazors.com/product/ikon-tek-tech-head/
(This post was last modified: 03-24-2020, 12:10 AM by LOOT.)
While I appreciated the end results, there was nothing enjoyable about the ITech except selling it. There are a couple of razors that cut as close, or closer, and do it much more comfortably. The ITech is not the king of the efficiency world it once was.
(03-24-2020, 12:09 AM)LOOT Wrote: While I appreciated the end results, there was nothing enjoyable about the ITech except selling it. There are a couple of razors that cut as close, or closer, and do it much more comfortably. The ITech is not the king of the efficiency world it once was.
It shaves like shavette or a razor without bar rather than a safety razor.
I agree It is definitely not a smooth razor or not comfortable either. but I like how it shaves, so blade-forward.
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)