#41

Mike Distress
New Jersey
I only have the .84OC, but I like it. Milder than the Lupo .95OC, but I do still favor the Lupo personally. I had wanted to use the GC .84OC recently but seem to have misplaced it. It isn't where I remember putting it last so I must have moved it and forgot.
integritas pietas fortitudinem
#42

novacula regem
Greece
More to the left : lower / less ,
more to the right : higher/more .
Every asterisk is a "click" .
Caution : Just an empirical and personal evaluation !

Efficiency ( aka "depth of cut per pass" ) :
BBS *** GC .84-P ** GC .84 OC /JAWS * GC 1.05-P / Lupo .95 sb

Aggressiveness ( aka the potential of possible injury) :
BBS *** GC 1.05-P * GC .84-P * GC .84 OC * GC .84 JAWS * Lupo .95 sb


GC .84 OC to my face delivers the same close shaves as the Lupo .95 sb does ,
but in a more user friendly way than the latter.Haven't tried the Lupo .95 OC .
GC -1.05 is even more user friendly than the GC .84-P !

metal_shavings, Calm_Shaver, Sweeney and 1 others like this post
I Need New Conspiracy Theories 
Because All Old Ones Came True
#43

Mike Distress
New Jersey
I used the 1.05 – P today against about a weeks worth of growth. I had no issues taking it down. Due to the amount of growth, I did take shorter strokes and rinsed the razor a little bit more frequently than I normally would with two days of growth.  I did two passes, one with the grain and one against the grain with just some light buffing for touchups. Pretty much a BBS shave or very darn near close. It's been a little over eight hours now since the shave and I can barely feel a little growth coming in. A nice, comfortable shave with no irritation. The Game Changer series really does seem to have smooth shaving down to kind of a science.

Calm_Shaver, bjlefebvre, Stephanos1920 and 1 others like this post
integritas pietas fortitudinem


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)