(10-14-2017, 04:22 PM)ezlovan Wrote: (10-13-2017, 11:01 PM)Mystic Water Wrote: +1 I'm also really tired of the "mixing stuff in the bathtub/basement" depiction of artisan soapmaker/cosmetic makers.
Must be nice to be so wealthy. We still mix ours in an old toilet. Outdoor type, of course. ;-)
Rod, isn’t that why it’s called Toilet Water?
All kidding aside, meeting the folks of Chatillon Lux, Stirling, Black Tie Razor, Sudsy Soapery and others puts a different perspective on things as to the scents they make and why they make them.
Steve56tated that he felt that many of the scents coming from artisans were too sweet for his taste and he preferred those from older houses like Dior, Penhaligon’s or Floris. I can appreciate that to a degree but there are plenty of scents coming out of Dior and others that I find beyond dreadful. Again, I use the example of Dior’s Sauvage (not Eau Sauvage) that I simply cannot get near. Scent, for me, is too personal an aspect of eau de toilettes, or even shaving soaps, to say that the older houses are, across the board, better than artisans. I mix and match all the time. For example, a favorite combination of mine is
ezlovan’s Gin & Tonic shaving soap and Penhaligon’s Juniper Sling, an artisan/traditional house combination. Another one I really like, and admit it would be too sweet for a lot of folks, is Soap Commander’s Love (True Rose) and
hawns’ still in testing stage Yuzu/Rose/Patchouli Eau de Toilette, which is not a pure rose scent. That, of course, is an artisan/artisan combination. I honestly don’t think there is any right or wrong here and there are
certainly no joe (or jane) blows here. That’s just insulting and misses the point completely, as far as I’m concerned.