(This post was last modified: 05-12-2018, 03:04 PM by ESBrushmaker.)
(05-12-2018, 03:29 AM)wyze0ne Wrote: (05-12-2018, 02:43 AM)rawfox1 Wrote: (05-12-2018, 02:39 AM)wyze0ne Wrote: If you look at the pictures, it says "Socket Size: 28mm" at the bottom. andrewjs18 pretty much confirmed that in post #7. He did say he was going to double check though.
Socket size does not mean knot size but thanks for the info usually the knot size is a millimeter or two less
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
That's true. I'm sure someone will chime in with the answer.
That's an interesting question, Gentlemen. As Andrew mentioned earlier, the 2018 LE brushes will be filled with our 1804A2 knots in Bulb and Fan profiles (25 in each.) To answer the specific question, their effective knot size is 28mm. However, their "plug size"--the diameter of the base plug--is, as Rawfox1 and wyseOne suggest, approximately 26mm.
What's going on?
Simply this: the amount of hair stuffed into these knots requires a
28mm socket.
We see the same thing with Shavemac, TGN and others. Yet at the same time, WSP and still others sell knots based on their required socket diameter. Now, to make things even more interesting, our own knot inventory contains knots sized
both ways! The 1801A2, 1804A2, and a series still in testing require a socket ~2mm larger than the plug size. But our 1503 and 1704 knots call for sockets
equal to their plug diameters! (I hope you can see how things could become "real confusing real quick!"
)
I'm not suggesting that either sizing method is good or bad. They are what they are. What I am saying is that "socket size" is the controlling factor. That's why we, along with one or two others, have come to favor that term.
I hope this answers the question.