#11
(03-13-2019, 03:59 AM)SHAVEWIZARD420 Wrote: I'm kind of surpirsed CRSW did not put their name or any identification on the label. It has a simple artisan type of vibe that is cool, unfornuately im not a big fan of MWF or Haslinger Sheeps Milk as the scent is almost non existant. Would love the see this formula released in different scents.

You don't like the scent of the new one?
#12
I can’t wait to try mine. It appears to be slick!

ishaver likes this post
#13
(03-13-2019, 03:59 AM)SHAVEWIZARD420 Wrote: I'm kind of surpirsed CRSW did not put their name or any identification on the label. It has a simple artisan type of vibe that is cool, unfornuately im not a big fan of MWF or Haslinger Sheeps Milk as the scent is almost non existant. Would love the see this formula released in different scents.

If you don't like the scent of either MWF or Haslinger Schafmilch, you might actually like this soap. I don't think Schapenmelk smells like either one of those, but the performance is very similar to Haslinger. Schapenmelk to me has more of a cologne-y "sport" scent. Very nice soap, but I wish it would come in either unscented form or in some of CRSW's other great scents.

ishaver and BPman like this post
#14
Just received my puck in the mail today. Will report back with review.

[Image: YEBeaMS.jpg]

ishaver, Matsilainen and BPman like this post
#15
I would like to see a photo of the unwrapped puck before usage if it's not too much trouble, please.
Secretary Ramsey put his foot into it yesterday . . . in the course of his remarks he said that California “needs water and better society.”  “So does h-ll,” yelled someone in the crowd.  
#16
I already opened mine and used it but it looks like a regular shave soap cake/puck. If your curious you should go ahead and get one. For $8.95 it's a no brainer and as good as soaps costing 2x or even 3x as much.

linuxguile likes this post
#17
Here is a picture of the puck as requested.
[Image: 0FHF2xf.jpg]

BPman, linuxguile and Matsilainen like this post
#18
(This post was last modified: 03-22-2019, 11:46 PM by Gillette#58.)
Not a very hard soap. You can definitely make an indent with your finger. I cut some off the puck to do a bowl lather. Lathered very easily. Very good slickness and post shave feel. I’m not one to ask about defining a scent. All I can say is pleasant and not overpowering. Scent strength maybe a three on a 10 scale. I highly recommend this soap to anyone who is curious about the new offering from CRSW.

Matsilainen, gregcss and BPman like this post
#19

Member
Virginia
(03-22-2019, 11:41 PM)Gillette#58 Wrote: Not a very hard soap. You can definitely make an indent with your finger. I cut some off the puck to do a bowl leather. Lathered very easily. Very good slickness and post shave feel.  I’m not one to ask about defining a scent.  All I can say is pleasant and not overpowering. Scent strength maybe a three on a 10 scale.  I highly recommend this soap  to anyone who is curious about the new offering from CRSW.

Thanks for the info. I ordered a puck two days ago and it shipped today. I've been wanting to try a hard soap so I went with this but sounds like this is a medium-hard soap?
#20
Yes. Medium-hard is how I would best describe it. I hope you are as pleased with the performance as I was.


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)