(09-20-2018, 01:39 PM)BPman Wrote: (09-17-2018, 11:04 PM)Marko Wrote: Yeah, I can see the perfume business being even more heartless than say, the rock and roll business. You can be an overnight sensation, even though it took you two decades to do it and then you can be tossed with yesterday's trash in a heartbeat. Or you can toil in obscurity your entire life. I think approaching that with caution is a wise strategy.
Euroweenie IFRA regs ruined perfumery in the past decade. That's why most perfumes/colognes smell the same as well as don't last as long.
I don't really agree with that. Did they do tons of damage? Sure. Is that why most mainstream fragrances are derivative? I don't think so.
In my experience, the homogeneity of mainstream fragrance is due much more to the machinations of marketing departments and accountants. In the mid-70s, YSL (before its perfume division was sold to L'Oreal) and what is now LVMH began creating fragrances by focus group testing rather than independent idea. However, the problem is that the general public generally cannot innovate on its own. If it could, I imagine that we would be much further along as a species.
Thus, the focus groups simply asked for more of the same, which YSL and LVMH were happy to give them in spades (and at premium prices). However, many independent perfumers and some of the still-working great masters produce fragrances that are IFRA-compliant and works of genius, but which are not intended for sale to the general public and thus have not been focus-tested or polished by hive mind fiat. Smell the works coming out of Bogue, Baruti, Frederic Malle's earlier releases, or Zoologist (all of which are IFRA-compliant, except Bogue's
Cologne Reloaded). Personal preferences aside, they're all very different, very good, and last a damned long time, too.
“You could leave life right now. Let that determine what you do and say and think.” – Marcus Aurelius
Fine grooming products at Barrister and Mann.
www.barristerandmann.com