(12-28-2017, 01:52 AM)Shavemd Wrote: 2 shaves in and my initial thoughts are It is a good looking razor with nice balance and weight. I really like the knurling on the handle. The first 2 shaves using a Gillette red stainless blade and plate D are very good, not great. More blade feel than my Timeless .95 and not quite as efficient but I am still working on the angle. No nicks, cuts or irritation. In defense of this razor I am just coming off 2 weeks of using the 17-4 Paradigm which is super smooth. I want to give this razor a good 2 weeks before I decide if it’s a keeper but it sure looks and feels nice especially at the price.
Looking to hear how the Karve compares to the Paradigm. I just ordered the Karve. Hopefully it will find a suitable place in my rotation and the desire for something else will subside.
(12-27-2017, 07:07 PM)drdeemanda Wrote: Is there any blade movement with this razor? I like how blades fit snuggly in my timeless and I’m hoping that blade alignment or movement won’t be an issue with this razor.
I don't find any movement with the blades. It is a very snug fit.
Actually, this is one of the nicest razor heads I have seen.
Celestino
Love, Laughter & Shaving
Love, Laughter & Shaving
(12-28-2017, 04:15 AM)MaxP Wrote:(12-28-2017, 01:52 AM)Shavemd Wrote: 2 shaves in and my initial thoughts are It is a good looking razor with nice balance and weight. I really like the knurling on the handle. The first 2 shaves using a Gillette red stainless blade and plate D are very good, not great. More blade feel than my Timeless .95 and not quite as efficient but I am still working on the angle. No nicks, cuts or irritation. In defense of this razor I am just coming off 2 weeks of using the 17-4 Paradigm which is super smooth. I want to give this razor a good 2 weeks before I decide if it’s a keeper but it sure looks and feels nice especially at the price.
Looking to hear how the Karve compares to the Paradigm. I just ordered the Karve. Hopefully it will find a suitable place in my rotation and the desire for something else will subside.
I'm observing this thread carefully. I use a Timeless .95, which I enjoy as one of my "milder" razors that can still deliver a great shave. (I'm more inclined to go with "aggressive" razors.) I have both a Karve and a Paradigm 17-4 on order. I like reading about the blade-forwardness of the Karve, but am concerned about its efficiency. I also like reading about the efficiency of the Paradigm, although I worry about its "smoothness" (which means "inability-to-deliver-a-close-shave" in my lexicon). I guess I'll find out!
--Scott
(12-28-2017, 08:31 AM)CCity Wrote:In my humble opinion I feel if you enjoy the .95 Timeless you will enjoy the smoothness and the efficiency of the Paradigm 17-4(12-28-2017, 04:15 AM)MaxP Wrote:(12-28-2017, 01:52 AM)Shavemd Wrote: 2 shaves in and my initial thoughts are It is a good looking razor with nice balance and weight. I really like the knurling on the handle. The first 2 shaves using a Gillette red stainless blade and plate D are very good, not great. More blade feel than my Timeless .95 and not quite as efficient but I am still working on the angle. No nicks, cuts or irritation. In defense of this razor I am just coming off 2 weeks of using the 17-4 Paradigm which is super smooth. I want to give this razor a good 2 weeks before I decide if it’s a keeper but it sure looks and feels nice especially at the price.
Looking to hear how the Karve compares to the Paradigm. I just ordered the Karve. Hopefully it will find a suitable place in my rotation and the desire for something else will subside.
I'm observing this thread carefully. I use a Timeless .95, which I enjoy as one of my "milder" razors that can still deliver a great shave. (I'm more inclined to go with "aggressive" razors.) I have both a Karve and a Paradigm 17-4 on order. I like reading about the blade-forwardness of the Karve, but am concerned about its efficiency. I also like reading about the efficiency of the Paradigm, although I worry about its "smoothness" (which means "inability-to-deliver-a-close-shave" in my lexicon). I guess I'll find out!
I can't tell you anything about the Karve but from what I'm reading I would love to hear your feedback but for now I am passing on it
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
(12-28-2017, 08:44 AM)rawfox1 Wrote:(12-28-2017, 08:31 AM)CCity Wrote:In my humble opinion I feel if you enjoy the .95 Timeless you will enjoy the smoothness and the efficiency of the Paradigm 17-4(12-28-2017, 04:15 AM)MaxP Wrote: Looking to hear how the Karve compares to the Paradigm. I just ordered the Karve. Hopefully it will find a suitable place in my rotation and the desire for something else will subside.
I'm observing this thread carefully. I use a Timeless .95, which I enjoy as one of my "milder" razors that can still deliver a great shave. (I'm more inclined to go with "aggressive" razors.) I have both a Karve and a Paradigm 17-4 on order. I like reading about the blade-forwardness of the Karve, but am concerned about its efficiency. I also like reading about the efficiency of the Paradigm, although I worry about its "smoothness" (which means "inability-to-deliver-a-close-shave" in my lexicon). I guess I'll find out!
I can't tell you anything about the Karve but from what I'm reading I would love to hear your feedback but for now I am passing on it
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
I'll keep you posted! I suspect that I will wish that Karve made an E plate, as the D plate won't be efficient enough. At least that's what I think about my other adjustables (Slim--why didn't they go to "11"?--Variant, Supply, Rockwell 6S...), except for the Charcoal Goods Level 3. I'll never try the CG Level 1 or 2, as I know the Level 3 is the top end of an adjustable that actually meets my needs. When I spoke with Brian at Charcoal about whether the Level 3 was efficient enough, he assured me that he tried to amp it up from there, but couldn't create a plate 4 that wouldn't chew up my face. That was good enough endorsement for the Level 3, in my book. And he was right. We'll see with the Karve.
--Scott
(12-28-2017, 07:30 AM)celestino Wrote:(12-27-2017, 07:07 PM)drdeemanda Wrote: Is there any blade movement with this razor? I like how blades fit snuggly in my timeless and I’m hoping that blade alignment or movement won’t be an issue with this razor.
I don't find any movement with the blades. It is a very snug fit.
Actually, this is one of the nicest razor heads I have seen.
Perfect! I’ve got the 3.5” handle with B and C plates on their way and I’m already considering purchasing the D plate before the rest even arrive. I love the look of brass. Also, I saw that you recently decided to put your Blackbird OC plate up for trade. Wasn’t your cup of tea?
First use with this razor this morning. I must say, I was impressed. I was not expecting the B plate to be as efficient as it was for me. I like the CG Level 1 and 2, Wolfman .61, Weber DLC for frame of reference. I only ordered the B plate with the razor. Not sure if I should even bother with a C plate. I'm sure curiosity will get the best of me and cost me more money lol. The craftmanship of the razor is top notch. and at the listed price point; it's a steal. As a Canadian, I can say that I'm proud that another quality razor is being manufactured in Canada! I'm going to give this a good two weeks worth of shaves to decide if I go with a C plate. I would love to hear from others about their experiences with the C Plate.
Carmine
"veni, vidi, vici"
"veni, vidi, vici"
(This post was last modified: 12-28-2017, 06:08 PM by celestino.)
(12-28-2017, 02:46 PM)drdeemanda Wrote: Perfect! I’ve got the 3.5” handle with B and C plates on their way and I’m already considering purchasing the D plate before the rest even arrive. I love the look of brass. Also, I saw that you recently decided to put your Blackbird OC plate up for trade. Wasn’t your cup of tea?I prefer SB razor heads to the OC ones.
(12-28-2017, 04:02 PM)Niro884 Wrote: First use with this razor this morning. I must say, I was impressed. I was not expecting the B plate to be as efficient as it was for me. I like the CG Level 1 and 2, Wolfman .61, Weber DLC for frame of reference. I only ordered the B plate with the razor. Not sure if I should even bother with a C plate. I'm sure curiosity will get the best of me and cost me more money lol. The craftmanship of the razor is top notch. and at the listed price point; it's a steal. As a Canadian, I can say that I'm proud that another quality razor is being manufactured in Canada! I'm going to give this a good two weeks worth of shaves to decide if I go with a C plate. I would love to hear from others about their experiences with the C Plate.Carmine, I don't find Plate C to be that aggressive. In fact, I find it very similar to my Weber DLC. Possibly, a tiny bit more 'efficient/aggressive', but it doesn't seem so. However, this is all very subjective, but I think you should just get Plate C as that would allow you another level of efficiency and the price is extremely reasonable.
Good luck.
Celestino
Love, Laughter & Shaving
Love, Laughter & Shaving
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)