(06-20-2020, 01:49 AM)Marko Wrote: There are just some more recent products that have made me say "damn, that was a great shave"
+1
(06-20-2020, 03:11 AM)HighSpeed Wrote: I have especially come to disdain beta tester and groupie hype like the plague.
+1
(06-20-2020, 03:48 AM)dominicr Wrote: Where is the improvement vs. cost intersection?
Technique, as well in soap making, helps performances.
Lots of nice soaps, in the medium range, are more expencive than high-end one.
Overall performance is about yield too.
Palmolive cream (low range) costs me about 8 bucks less (in a year) than Saponificio Varesino Beta 4.3.
But to use It, I need preshave and aftershave ... sooooo, IMHO It's more expencive than SV.
It's a matter of technology, not just the price.
(06-20-2020, 11:00 PM)mrdoug Wrote: I understand the whole, 'you get what you pay for' mantra...
Not really.
Lots of good soap (mostly spanish sticks, as LEA and La Toja, or Speick) are cheap.
But performances are very close to more expencive super hyped soaps.
(06-20-2020, 11:00 PM)mrdoug Wrote: ... more soap makers should sell 2oz soaps.
I'd love all soap makers add sample option.
I use sample mostly, and the few times I love the soap then I purchase It.
Forums are good for this too.
(06-21-2020, 04:54 PM)DanLaw Wrote: To those of us "blessed" by life, the technological breakthroughs mattering little to normal people are of monumental significance.
Very difficult to make understand this to "normal" people.
I totally agree.
Hi-tech soaps are more difficult to make, and more expencive.
But who suffer with skin disease, can cut off most of the accessories.
And performances are evident, a lot more than on normal skin.
But mostly some "healing" soaps works in deep, with time of some days.
It's a matter of fact, just study some skin physiology and dermatology.
As a person with dermatitis, pharmacist and wetshaver, I know.